Elements of a Government Proposal

Government Proposal

Government Proposal

A government proposal refers to a response to written requirements issued by a government entity that wants to buy something. Outside business circles, it commonly it called a legislative motion. Governments request competitive contract schemes when they believe there are more issues than initial cost in buying a needed product or service.

Most offers contain the following sections:

Requirement matrix, where in the vendor’s response will be found.

Executive summary, a synopsis of why a customer should buy from the proposing vendor.

Technical or management discussion that tells how the vendor should meet the requirements. It also contains a discussion of how the vendor will manage the contract if it is awarded.

Cost volume, a presentation of all costs. It includes the cost basis, implementation plan and implementation schedule.

Past performance or relevant experience volume gives details of the performance on past contracts of similar size and scope.

Most of these offers are lengthy. It is so as they are a response to written requirements and they have to address each one of them. For instance, in case of competitive ones, the vendor might mention certain facts that might differentiate his product or service from others. Even short ones include cost data of ten pages. The large ones can go up to thousands of pages. They are expensive due to detailed requirements and necessary cost and scheduling information. Business proposals often provide a written description of a transaction as a basis for approval. They are comparatively short. There is little or no regulation of these schemes between businesses. However, larger companies may be bound by a significant amount of policies and procedures. Government procurement processes are very complicated and highly regulated. And the regulations and process is different for each government. Federal, state, local, and international governments all have different regulations and processes. Many government procurement processes are based on those used by the Federal Government. The Federal Acquisition Regulation is the primary set of rules governing how the Federal Government manages the procurement process, including how it issues and receives schemes. Hence, to prepare an offer one has to abide by rules and regulations.

Terrorism And The Constitution

Terrorism And The Constitution

Terrorism And The Constitution

Immediately after the constitution became the supreme law its detractions warned that to much unstrained powers had been given to the central government.

Thomas Jefferson was among those who embraced the constitution but feared that without certain clauses the document did not protect individuals.

The result was a list of ten additional articles limiting the powers of the federal government.
The bill of rights established how things will work.

When members of the radical Islamist Cult Al Qaeda flew fully fueled jumbo jets into the World Trade Center on September11, 2001,nation paid attention.

Fear gripped the nation and people lashed out at fellow Americans who dared to say or do anything that did not follow lock-step with what the administration.

The host of the talk show politically incorrect, Bill Maher, responding to the George Bush stated opinion that the September 11 events were cowardly acts, said this on the air.

The show sponsors, Federal Express and Sears, pulled their advertising and the network ABC pulled the Show.

White House spokes person Ari Fleischer commented with these chilling words: all Americans need to watch what they say, watch what they do.

This was the death of the first amendment. Some Americans were saying we were sacrificing the very freedoms we were claming to be defending.

Most Americans feel that in a time of war, the United States should be a model of civil liberties and civil rights protecting individual rights under the constitution.

Civil liberty since the USA-Patriot Act was to make the country a safer place for Americans citizens by expanding the reach of law enforcement.

It included sweeping changes in definitions and descriptions of what constituted suspicion, denied due process to huge numbers of people.

It even created new and incredibly ambiguous acts that appear to be intended to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.

Terrorism and the constitution is always a problem of trying to keep a balance of both competing interest of the government and the rights of people protected by the bill of rights and the constitution.

Civil liberties the personal guarantees and freedoms that the federal government can not abridge by law.

The civil rights the government protected rights of individual against arbitrary discrimination because ethnicity, especially after 911.

The Bill of Rights and the fourthteen amendment of the constitution are major corner stones of the constitution and should never be allowed to be subvert in this era of terrorism.

Dui Defense Lawyers Los Angeles Video

Defense Lawyers

Defense Lawyers

Do not hesitate to call and hang up a meeting having a Houston criminal lawyer. Houston includes a reputation for like a hotbed in the best defense attorneys in Texas. Just like you pick a doctor, choose care in who you hire.

In many instances, the request seems harmless. But in some instances, an individual could possibly be embarrassed to let an officer search his car. The potential shame may come from any number of materials, including intimate items, treatments, and LA Clippers memorabilia.

Work quickly to get the person out of jail – If you or someone you love is charged which has a crime and in jail, your Seattle defense lawyer better make every effort they could to secure your release. There are numerous actions which can be taken by way of a Seattle criminal defense attorney to make certain this happens. This involves motions setting or reduce bail, motions for release on their own recognizance, or possibly a request for supervised release.

Make certain considerations is likely being cost. Most of folks don’t provide an indefinite amount of funds. If you use a small budget then will be your main deciding factor. It’s worth pointing released that this most over priced Minneapolis criminal attorney.isn’t just the best an individual case. Even using a smaller budget, you ought to always still be capable of pinpoint a really reliable, experienced to reasonably priced Minneapolis Criminal Attorney. Your Specialist doesn’t have to rate a smaller fortune related to being good.

When it comes for the appeals process experience is quite important. Trying to obtain a trial lawyer who may have only tried cases in state courts to deal with an appeal can be dangerous. You want somebody who has been within the appeals courts and knows how things work. A good criminal appeal lawyer can have appeals cases under his belt. He will have been within the appeals courts and know what should be done as a way to win an incident and get it appealed. He will know what needs to be labored on to come up while using best case and understand the expectations placed upon someone once they appeal their case.

Anyone who is facing charges of your serious offense in Tampa, is recommended to hire a professional Tampa criminal lawyer as soon because they are arrested. You need to seek legal services before you talk on the police or you could risk seriously compromising your defense case at a later date. However, you will need to ensure you work with a lawyer who’s experienced with the type of charges you happen to be facing to give you the most effective chance problem.

The American Bar Affiliation produced a new summary that indigent defense about this land has reached a situation of crisis. A great deal of defenders are made to deal with effectively in excess of the thousand instances a yr, additional los angeles personal injury lawyers than three moments the ABA claims a legal professional can adequately take care of. In this tough tax financial state, public defenders in several communities only don’t possess the funds to make available their consumers the enough defense the Constitution demands.

Anyone facing a criminal court case, whether they may be innocent or guilty in the crime showcased, should find themselves legal representation coming from a qualified Virginia criminal lawyer. Even though one does have the directly to represent yourself, anyone who has tried to guard themselves problem usually fail in the first hurdle. Having a qualified lawyer at your side may be the best approach to put together a great defense case that will win in the judge and jury in the courtroom.

Competition in Iranian Presidential Elections

Iranian Presidential Elections

Iranian Presidential Elections

When it comes to the competition in Iranian presidential elections, it is often interesting to see how the electoral candidates for the presidential position stack up against each other. Iran is the first and only Islamic republic in the world. Its political structure is unique and to learn about it, you cannot bring any example. Therefore, to study its presidential elections, you’ll have to learn about the Iranian presidential elections and no other models.

According to the present election laws of Islamic Republic of Iran, it is the Guardian Council which oversees and approves the electoral candidates for most national elections in Iran. Six clerics appointed by the Supreme Leader and six jurists elected by the parliament or Majlis make up the 12 members who are the part of the Guardian Council. As per the existing mandate of Iranian presidential elections, the Guardian council approves the Assembly of Experts candidates who supervise and elect the Supreme Leader.

Qualification of the Prospective Iranian President

The Iranian President is elected for 4 years in a national election. According to the Iranian Constitutions, the candidates for Presidency must possess the following qualifications:

– He must have Iranian origin

– He must be an Iranian national

– He should have administrative capacity and resourcefulness

– He should have an impeccable record

– He should be trustworthy

– He should believe in the fundamental principles of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Disqualification of Electoral Candidates

Under the constitution of Iran, the Guardian Council, consisting of 12 clerics and jurists will finally have the last say as to the candidates in the Iranian Presidential Elections. They reserve the right to disqualify any candidate they deem unqualified. Many such candidates have been disqualified in the past elections. Thus, the Iranian President cannot be elected without getting the go-ahead from the Guardian Council prior to the actual course of elections.

The constitution of Iran dictates that the President of Iran can be removed from office by two methods. If a judge reports a criminal record of the president, then the Supreme Leader reserves the right to remove him. The second case is when the Majlis decides that the president is ineligible; again the Supreme Leader can remove him.

Overview of Iranian Presidential Elections

The Iranian presidential elections have offered a competitive campaign among the electoral candidates in the past. However, with a political system as intriguing as Iran’s and many ambitious presidential candidates vying for the coveted position, the outcome of Iranian presidential elections always has some surprise in store for the people, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the rest of the world as well. No wonder then why the Iranian presidential elections, more often that not, hog the limelight of the foreign media in the international political landscape.

The Suitability Of Government

Government

Government

The State is an organized society, wielding power and exercising authority. Society, however, is more than a political entity, or a set of boundaries on a map. The basic unit of the State is the citizen. The basic unit of Society is the person. Because the person is also the citizen, Society and State overlap where social order and political fact are concerned.

The vitality of the State is not conferred by its political order, but rather flows from the social fact. This social fact is the spiritual and physical life of its many human members. When a man thinks of the State, he inevitably envisions policemen, taxmen, dog catchers, and bureaucrats in the highway department. When the same man contemplates his Country however, no such easily defined or concrete images come to mind. If the figure of the State is the lawmaker, the figure of the Country could well be the song writer or war hero.

An oppressive state leader could silence the song writer or cause the brave to lose heart, but all would be the poorer for it, because vitality flows from the society up, not the other way around. Men who love their country have been known to die for it. American history is full of such examples. At Valley Forge, Gettysburg, Belleau Wood, Midway, or Iwo Jima, men did not die for the War Department, the State Department, or the Tennessee Valley Authority. They fought beneath the unfurled banner of their nation, with thoughts of home and family forever enshrined in their hearts.

The stability of the state greatly depends on this love of country. The fact that Ceasar wants and needs this love proves that the political order should grow out of the social fact. Men should be governed in a manner that suits them. This cardinal principle of government is today in eclipse. Today there is much talk and movement in every area of life towards a New World Order. This World Political Order or One World Government would be an attempt at political order without social fact.

Men and women of any given country are well aware of their oneness in society and are therefore able to form a state. There is though, no such feeling of oneness for the human race as a whole in our present world predicament. There is no common view on anything essential in the social fact. There is not even agreement on whom or what Man is. A world political order of any description is neither possible nor desirable at this time.

It is also a grave evil to impose our form of government on the people of another country. It simply is not possible to get a Constitutional Republic, with separation of powers, limited central government, protection of minority rights, and the rule of law, by installing ballot boxes in third world, Middle Eastern, or Islamic countries. There is no historical foundation there, which would guarantee the rule of law. What you do get by installing ballot boxes is a temporary democracy that leads to majority rule and eventually mobocracy, anarchy, and tyranny.

In the case of America, there is no constitutional mandate to promote democracy anywhere. America is not a democracy and was never intended to be one. The Founding Fathers of America knew this all too well. That is why they gave us a Constitutional Republic, not majority rule. America is a great example of how thousands of years of trial and error in government and economics finally came to fruition in the year 1776.

This was indeed an example of the social fact moving to establish political order. Our government suits us best because it is a result of centuries of effort, involving forms of government, rule of law, the idea of unalienable rights, checks and balances, and cultural diversity. The freedoms we enjoy as Americans cannot be gained by roaming the world installing ballot boxes and then sending Jimmy Carter to ensure the fairness of the elections. The end result of such arrogance and corruption is majority rule and tyranny.

Others before us have had similar thoughts on the nature of democracy. James Russell Lowell believed that democracy gave every man the right to be his own oppressor. Lord Thomas Babbington Macaulay, was convinced that institutions purely democratic, must sooner or later destroy liberty, civilization, or both. Oscar Wilde was quite certain that democracy meant the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people. The great American Justice John Marshall new the difference between a republic and a democracy. The difference was like that between order and chaos. Emanuel Kant, equated democracy with despotism.