Significance of the JFK Assassination

John F. Kennedy

John F. Kennedy

For those who were of age and alive at the time of the Dallas killing, a fresh memory of the times and era are integral to their assessment. Those who were born later, have no firsthand experience of the actual change that took place to the body politics. Comparing before and after is mostly forgotten by the history accounts. For those who remember, the country started on a downward spiral that continues to the present. The assassination of John F. Kennedy was a political coup d’tat and has been described as an enigma with many layers of disinformation. However, peeling back this onion exposes a rot that very much explains the current condition of our country.

When raising the subject of a conspiracy, it is both amusing and tragic that establishment defenders are quick to discredit the investigator, while avoiding facts, evidence and common sense. Solving the mystery to the satisfaction of competing and often conflicting factions is not necessary. However, understanding the course of events that took hold after the Camelot myth was buried is intensely valuable. The end of innocence became an existential awakening to the perceptive, while believing the conclusions of the Warren commission provided reassurance for not facing reality.

Why did powerful elites fear Kennedy? The Entire John F. Kennedy Secret Society Speech provides the motive behind the mask of the media filter.

From this “President and the Press” Speech (April 27, 1961)

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

Rubber Stamps for the Office

rubber stamps

rubber stamps

Most of us have seen massive innovations within business office technological innovation nowadays. From complicated Pcs to excessive speed instant broadband accessible kept intelligent phones in addition to notepads, faxes to e mail in addition to mobile phone devices. Although particular critical regions of our own business office hardware stop in spot in addition to many of us definitely could well be dropped with no them. The time is it possible you get through manufactured with no accomplishing for your loan calculator, stapler or even compose in addition to notepad? Silicone stamps usually are not any different and it is complicated to see precisely how technological innovation could substitute these kind of vital items at any time shortly.

A highly effective in addition to useful business will definitely have to have a beneficial share involving plastic rubber. There’re critical as soon as having files, granting or even rejecting paintings or even recommendations, franking your email and even more. The truth is, you will discover numerous seal of approval types regarding a range of purposes and this also one easy tag can express your own concept in an standard manner incredibly correctly over the business. Being mindful of this you must quickly have the capacity to resource a selection of rubber to fit your business. When your seal of approval you may need just isn’t accessible anyone can now style in addition to tailor-make a selection of rubber on the internet. This is furthermore a great advantage for anyone looking for a creative, imaginative seal of approval or even 1 maybe to become employed to personalize a wedding invitation or even appreciate it card.

In addition to the seal of approval anyone naturally will require ink. We have a particular method linked to the color with the ink. For instance, crimson ink implies negativity, so that you really should obtain crimson to become used in combination with stamps just like “rejected”, “quarantine” or even “invoice query”. However, environment friendly ink implies approval, so utilize having rubber just like “approved”, “paid” in addition to “passed”. Bare ink is actually far more standard and is popular having rubber demonstrating words just like “received” in addition to “processed”. To stop distress you have to stay with this colour scheme. Finally, some sort of seal of approval is a wonderful strategy for including some sort of close off for your outgoing email. Some sort of letter with all your company logo placed in the close off can glimpse definitely professional. That permits your organization to make an impact prior to a letter provides even already been popped.

So why certainly not verify your own stationery wardrobe today and provide your own rubber stamps a bit of a make-over?

Just about every businessman is aware of the value of plastic rubber stamps. Most widely used rubber stamps across the world incorporate labels, addresses along with portions of correspondence, just like internet sites, e mail ids etc. There are several other modern techniques by which you’ll ‘make your own mark’ in your clients by employing creative rubber stamps acquiring short, still useful communications regarding communication. Silicone rubber stamps with envelopes-make your visitors available your email Many businesses utilize rubber stamps with envelopes using their labels involving call persons, cellular phone figures in addition to addresses etc. Although you will discover rubber stamps which might be available for sale today which can make your visitors available these kind of envelopes. Folks be given lots of unnecessary mails; several of these mails land in trash. You don’t wish your own mails to travel unopened; why then certainly not utilize creative placed communications just like, ‘Open Me, Quite Important’ or even ‘I will never do you high quality from the trash’? These kinds of communications can’t only take some sort of laugh for your consumers’ confronts, they’ll furthermore turn out truly beginning your mails.

Personalizing Fliers utilizing rubber stamps

Fliers which has a personalized placed concept usually are used far more severely than kinds with no these kind of communications in addition to marks. Buyers can preserve your fliers in addition to note down your organization in addition to call information you have placed on top of your files. It’s just like presenting your organization card instead of some sort of flier. Creators of these studies in addition to plastic rubber stamps Many creators of these studies offer guides on e-book signing activities kept within substantial bookstores or even community libraries. These kinds of guides is usually placed utilizing custom made rubber stamps acquiring communications just like ‘Promotional Copy, Not really regarding sale’ etc.

Obamacare As a Jobs Killer



Economic illiteracy is a hallmark of most political policies. The prime example of this principle is the idiocy out of the Obama administration that maintains that the Affordable Care Act is favorable to job seekers. The ranks of progressive euphoria reporting on the joys of Obamacare want to spin the latest Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) analysis as favorable. As these imbeciles push out their demented dreams for a neo Great Society, the facts of trade and industry need to be buried in order to institute the total welfare state.

In the face of ignoring that productive employment is a worthy and necessary goal for a healthy economy, avid Obama supporters cannot escape empirical reality. Even a flagship liberal publication like Atlantic is obliged to ask, Is Obamacare a Job-Killer After All?

“The reduction in CBO’s projections of hours worked represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2.0 million in 2017, rising to about 2.5 million in 2024. Although CBO projects that total employment (and compensation) will increase over the coming decade that increase will be smaller than it would have been in the absence of the ACA.”

Such words, often dismissed by those who reject conflicting statistics, need to view the video CBO: Obamacare is a Job Killer. If the revered NYT: It’s Actually Great Obamacare Will Spur 2.5 Million to Leave their Job, can joke about the fate of the unemployed, maybe their writers better hit the streets and try to find a useful job.
The 2.5 million workers that will be driven out of the workforce due to Obamacare is actually “a liberating result of the law,” according The New York Times (emphasis added):

“The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Tuesday that the Affordable Care Act will reduce the number of full-time workers by 2.5 million over the next decade. That is mostly a good thing, a liberating result of the law. Of course, Republicans immediately tried to brand the findings as “devastating” and stark evidence of President Obama’s health care reform as a failure and a job killer. It is no such thing.

The report estimated that €” thanks to an increase in insurance coverage under the act and the availability of subsidies to help pay the premiums €” many workers who felt obliged to stay in a job that provided health benefits would now be able to leave those jobs or choose to work fewer hours than they otherwise would have. In other words, the report is about the choices workers can make when they are no longer tethered to an employer because of health benefits. The cumulative effect on the labor supply is the equivalent of 2.5 million fewer full-time workers by 2024.”

Confidence in Government

The legislature is at a record disapproval as Gallup announced that Congress had reached a new low, winning the approval of just 9% of the American public. In addition, President Obama is in the same boat. A Christian Science Monitor reports that Obama disapproval rating hits new high in two polls. “An NBC News/Wall Street Journal survey found that 54 percent of respondents did not approve of the job President Obama is doing, and Quinnipiac found 57 percent disapproval.” Both branches of federal government register public discontent.

Confidence in Government

Confidence in Government

Even with such low confidence in Congress, the most telling sentiment is expressed in the Fox poll, Voters don’t like President Obama bypassing Congress.

“The new poll finds that 74 percent think the president using executive orders to get around Congress is not how things are supposed to work in our country. That includes 54 percent of Democrats.”

This critical attitude illustrates that America is supposed to be governed under laws passed by a representative legislature, and not by fiat directives of an imperial president. The bipartisan disfavor of the House and Senate stems primarily from the unwillingness of a Harry Reid run Senate that refuses to negotiate with an all too often submissive RINO Republican leadership.

When the Democrats stonewall any modest proposal for cooperative compromise, the timid GOP establishment representatives fold like a cheap suit. The inevitable result is that the time-honored legislative process fails miserably. Government simply does not work. Both parties define a functional lawmaking arrangement as getting what you want by trading off against what the loyal opposition demands. Plainly, Democrats and Republicans are not dedicated to solving actual problems. Their joint mission is devoted to keeping the fractural procedure intact.

Critics like to call this dysfunctional dilemma as a lack of will to form a consensus. This supposition lacks insight into the real nature of politics. Presupposing that government is able to pass positive initiatives, much less administer the programs that Congress authorizes and funds, is not proved out by performance.

James Joyner writes in American Trust in Government at All-Time Lows the following indicators from recent Gallop polls.

82% of Americans disapprove of the way Congress is handling its job.
69% say they have little or no confidence in the legislative branch of government, an all-time high and up from 63% in 2010.

57% have little or no confidence in the federal government to solve domestic problems, exceeding the previous high of 53% recorded in 2010 and well exceeding the 43% who have little or no confidence in the government to solve international problems.

53% have little or no confidence in the men and women who seek or hold elected office.

Americans believe, on average, that the federal government wastes 51 cents of every tax dollar, similar to a year ago, but up significantly from 46 cents a decade ago and from an average 43 cents three decades ago.

49% of Americans believe the federal government has become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens. In 2003, less than a third (30%) believed this.

Who Was The Marquis De Ruffec?

Marquis De Ruffec

Marquis De Ruffec

Most Americans can identify the Marquis de La Fayette as a dashing young French aristocrat and soldier who joined General Washington’s army to fight for American liberty from British rule in the American Revolutionary War. Many know how La Fayette passionately beseeched his king, King Louis XV, to support the American colonials’ bid for freedom from autocratic rule. Yet, was this story so simple? How could it be that La Fayette could persuade the French king to support a popular revolt against the British king?

The Pursuit of Power

The great kingdoms of Europe were formed by the victorious houses (families) of tribes of humans who fought with each other for control of people, land, and resources (power) for more than a millennium. The King of the House of Bourbon sat upon the throne of France during the time of the American Revolution. He had invested most of his power into the French army, as the French kings before him had done. Thus, France had an advantage if conflict (war) came in the form of land campaigns. However, France’s principal rival, Britain, an island realm, had the advantage when war was fought on the seas and oceans, since the Kings of Britain understood that their best protection was to keep armies from landing on British soil. As European kingdoms grew, wars became the means to expand territory. Arranged marriages became the means to encourage alliances. By 1776, many of the European houses were led by people who had the DNA of other European houses flowing in their veins. But, there was no guarantee that familial relationships would forestall war. In fact, all of the kings seemed to understand what Carl Von Clausewitz, a Prussian general and military theorist, (who was not yet born in 1776) would say: War is an extension of policies (politics). In other words, war was political maneuvering by kings through the use of weapons when diplomacy fell short of meeting strategic objectives.

Discovery of the World

Marco Polo, Vasco de Gama, and Christopher Columbus were three most notable explorers who opened up the greater world to the European kings and their quest for power. The spices of the orient, the riches of India, the manpower of Africa, and the agricultural space and precious metals of the Americas drew the European kings onto a worldwide scene to compete on a grand scale. Those who could not compete and win would be crushed by those kingdoms that did win. By 1776, it was clear who would win, the kingdom that controlled the seas! Even though Spain got to the Orient, India, and the Americas first, and was the first to exploit the fabulous silver and gold of South America, the riches had to flow back to Spain by seas and oceans. Great Britain’s naval might was supreme. The British could take, tax, or sink what Spain or the other European kings had claimed. That is why France, Spain, and the Dutch tended to ally when Britain threatened any one of them. King Louis XV did not want to react to what Britain did. So, he employed the Marquis de Ruffec, his trusted diplomat, in a hidden role, as his Chief of the Secret du Roi.

The Secret du Roi

French King Louis XV split his diplomatic service staff. Diplomats were expected to represent their kings overtly in the courts of other kings. Yet, some of the French King’s diplomats were secretly employed to pursue the strategic objectives of France by other means, including subversion, sabotage, usury, bribery, and even trickery of French citizens. These were unsavory tactics that were ways and means to advance the power of the King of France without their being linked to him. That is why Americans have not heard of the Marquis de Ruffec or the Secret du Roi. De Ruffec tricked the Marquis de La Fayette into throwing his heart and soul into helping the American colonials to revolt against Great Britain!

What was the Name of That War?

Americans call it The American War of Independence. Britain refers to the same war as a colonial revolt that occurred while they fought a world war with the French, the Spanish, the Dutch, and the Marathas and Mysore (in India). It was the job of The Secret du Roi to extend politics into the practice of war. The French had no great interest in Britain’s American colonies. They did have interests in India, in the islands of the Caribbean Sea, and in protecting France from invasion from across the English Channel. Thus, The Marquis de Ruffec was empowered to employ a tactic to ensnare an aristocratic citizen of France who was known to be the latest edition to a hot-blooded, even reckless family, Gilbert du Motier, aka The Marquis de La Fayette. The trick was that de Ruffec invited La Fayette to attend a dinner party in which he also invited an outspoken member of the British royal family, the Duke of Gloucester (British King George III’s brother). Since France was not presently at war with Britain, it was common for diplomats from the two countries to dine and debate. At the dinner table, de Ruffec encouraged the Duke to explain what the colonials were about. The Duke’s words inflamed the young de La Fayette! More importantly, de La Fayette was convinced that the colonials were justified in their revolt. After the dinner, de Ruffec offered to help de La Fayette get an audience before the king, to express his views about the subject. Then, de Ruffec worked secretly with King Louis XV to craft how to use de La Fayette as an instrument of national power to cause the British to tie down the maximum possible land and naval forces in the American colonial theater of operations. After all, war must come between France and Britain again, since war was but an extension of politics. The Marquis de Ruffec was a world shaper.